I like this book for many reasons but I’ll admit the reason it really stands out is because it dosen” shy away from the fact that goshawks eat bluejays and fox eat woodchucks. Perhaps it makes me overly bloodthirsty and morbid but I think that’s awesome and rare find in recent children’s books. When you read an older book, things get eaten up all the time, Peter Rabbit’s father was made into a pie after all. Nowadays it’d be more likely that he’d get sold to a pet shop and spend the rest of his life in as a classroom pet.
Come to think of it, Mr Rabbit may have preferred the pie.
In any case, in this book children are walking through the woods finding animal sign.
For instance they find blue feathers on the ground, and ask the question:
In addition to the bloodthirsty aspect and the excellent pictures I like that there is not a lot of text. Not much text has two benefits, either we can whip through the book at mock 10 because we’ve read it six times that day already and I really need to be getting dinner ready, or we can talk about what’s happening in the pictures, what time of year it is and try for the 7,000 time to convince Clara that it is a MUD dauber not a wood dauber.
But she is two and so I’m afraid it’s going to be a wood dauber for the foreseeable future.
Would I recommend it? Yes, there happens to be a whole series of these, I think we are going to have to find more at the library but I’m glad to own at least this one!